The question of age-gap relationships comes up not too infrequently, so here's something to start the discussion.
Jacob was 130 years old when he stood before Pharaoh in Egypt (Genesis 47:9). We are also told that he had been in Egypt for 17 years before he died at the age of 147 (Genesis 47:28). Joseph was 30 years old when he became the second-in-command of Egypt (Genesis 41:46). There were seven years of abundance followed by two years of famine before Jacob and his family came to Egypt (Genesis 41:47-53, 45:6). When Jacob arrived, Joseph had been in power for 9 years (7 years of plenty + 2 years of famine), making him about 39 years old (30 + 9). Therefore, working backward from Joseph's age, Jacob was probably 91 years old when Joseph was born. Joseph was the first of Rachel's sons; Benjamin being the second, and the youngest son of Jacob. Jacob had married Leah (and then Rachel a week later) when he was about 84 years old. Since Jacob had worked 7 years for Rachel, (but was tricked into taking Leah first) the women were probably in their early 20s at the time they were actually married.
Now we all know people lived longer back then, so working on age equivalents, this would be like a kiwi guy around 46 years old taking 4 young wives and starting his family.
Why do some have a problem with this? Why would this scenario result in fingers getting pointed at the man and his wives?
Please note, I am not advocating for or promoting underage marriages in this thread and ask that there be no question or comment inferring such. Keep it seemly! Cheers
Jacob was 130 years old when he stood before Pharaoh in Egypt (Genesis 47:9). We are also told that he had been in Egypt for 17 years before he died at the age of 147 (Genesis 47:28). Joseph was 30 years old when he became the second-in-command of Egypt (Genesis 41:46). There were seven years of abundance followed by two years of famine before Jacob and his family came to Egypt (Genesis 41:47-53, 45:6). When Jacob arrived, Joseph had been in power for 9 years (7 years of plenty + 2 years of famine), making him about 39 years old (30 + 9). Therefore, working backward from Joseph's age, Jacob was probably 91 years old when Joseph was born. Joseph was the first of Rachel's sons; Benjamin being the second, and the youngest son of Jacob. Jacob had married Leah (and then Rachel a week later) when he was about 84 years old. Since Jacob had worked 7 years for Rachel, (but was tricked into taking Leah first) the women were probably in their early 20s at the time they were actually married.
Now we all know people lived longer back then, so working on age equivalents, this would be like a kiwi guy around 46 years old taking 4 young wives and starting his family.
Why do some have a problem with this? Why would this scenario result in fingers getting pointed at the man and his wives?
Please note, I am not advocating for or promoting underage marriages in this thread and ask that there be no question or comment inferring such. Keep it seemly! Cheers
