Cochin Hebrew Manuscripts crushing false doctrines!

[Mojo]

what I’m observing in many parts of this forum is an overemphasis on legality and an under emphasis on expediency and charity.

What you are observing is a group of people doing what you encouraged all of us to do…searching the scriptures.

Verses are found. They are read. They are taken at strict face value. That might seem legalistic, but it’s actually just basic hermeneutics.

If you’re looking for charity, I suggest you reread I Corinthians 13:2. You may have more knowledge than others, but a little more humility and charity is in order.

Dial it back a notch, brother.

 

[MemeFan]

I like these examples. I think they’re good evidence. If we are being 100% honest, they are implicit, not explicit commands for polygyny. I’m not sure these are a slam dunk, but they can be deduced to at least allowing the possibility of polygyny since no qualifiers come before.

Yes, they are in proof category for polygyny.

Otherwise, Lord would have added not already married qualifier.

 

[Mojo]

Yes, they are in proof category for polygyny.

Otherwise, Lord would have added not already married qualifier.

I don’t disagree that they’re in the proof category. I’m just saying they’re in the implicit category.