-
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
Latest activity
-
HHeavens Declare reacted to frederick's post in the thread When did PM become taboo scripturaly? with
Like.
Sorry to play grammar police but it's a masculine accusative plural noun. -
HHeavens Declare reacted to Mark C's post in the thread When did PM become taboo scripturaly? with
Heart.
Uhhh..."mistresses" are usually thought to be voluntary... ...need I say more? -
HHeavens Declare reacted to MeganC's post in the thread When did PM become taboo scripturaly? with
Haha.
Bill Clinton had twelve mistresses over the years. Probably more since he left office. -
HHeavens Declare reacted to BiblicalLiteralist's post in the thread When did PM become taboo scripturaly? with Like.
Preciesely, the only evidence for monogamy is secular law. Thats the point I am trying to make. Another argument I see is the condition based polygyny. "The conditions were harsh then, and women needed more protection, didn't have rights...
-
HHeavens Declare reacted to MemeFan's post in the thread When did PM become taboo scripturaly? with Like.
Polygyny was never outlawed in New Testatement. In fact, careful reader will find new proofs for polygyny there. @PeteR is right. Roman law had negative influence on this custom. Horewer, this custom has persisted among Christians outside Rome...
-
HHeavens Declare reacted to PeteR's post in the thread When did PM become taboo scripturaly? with Heart.
Polygyny was not 'corrected or outlawed' in the new testament. Roman law outlawed polygyny for all in the empire EXCEPT Jews. Church fathers as late as 300 years after Yeshua described the Jews as having 'four or five' wives (Chrysostom?) And...
-
HHeavens Declare reacted to BiblicalLiteralist's post in the thread When did PM become taboo scripturaly? with Like.
I posted my woman monogamy choice question in a christian truther forum I am a part of and seemed to have really stirred the hornets nest. I haven't had the chance to put together a thorough response to everyones arguments there, but I left them...
-
Joleneakamama reacted to Ray's post in the thread False Witness on Polygamy: A Response to Michael Foster with Like.
Thanks very much for such clarity. -
Just follow the prompting of the Holy Spirit. He will give you the right words to say. Be careful around your job or business though. -
Joleneakamama reacted to Man_in_the_Middle's post in the thread Disclosing Biblical marriage views with Haha.
I take it all back... Your right. This is actually a cakewalk. Tomorrow, they will all bow their knees and repent of their MO stance. It will be so easy!!!!
-
HHeavens Declare replied to the thread Disclosing Biblical marriage views.Just follow the prompting of the Holy Spirit. He will give you the right words to say. Be careful around your job or business though.
-
HHeavens Declare reacted to MemeFan's post in the thread Disclosing Biblical marriage views with
Eye roll.
It's better to try to change culture as pastor than regular guy. Best quote for situation: https://www.azquotes.com/quote/531785 -
HHeavens Declare reacted to Man_in_the_Middle's post in the thread Disclosing Biblical marriage views with Like.
I take it all back... Your right. This is actually a cakewalk. Tomorrow, they will all bow their knees and repent of their MO stance. It will be so easy!!!!
-
HHeavens Declare reacted to Man_in_the_Middle's post in the thread Disclosing Biblical marriage views with Heart.
Memefan..... Have you not read all the posts of so many pastors that lost their jobs BECAUSE they were willing to say things that were biblically true but their church people were unwilling to hear it. Sadly. It is easy to lose an entire...
-
HHeavens Declare reacted to Fledgling's post in the thread Disclosing Biblical marriage views with Like.
To continue the side note: It's also not between son and daughter. It seems to be purely a generational divide. It's also interesting that the division seems to be explicitly not one-sided.