Hahaha, a new prescription for glasses might be in order. You were the one who posted the photo of the Jack Daniels bottle!Lol, I thought those were books, not alcohol.![]()
Hahaha, a new prescription for glasses might be in order. You were the one who posted the photo of the Jack Daniels bottle!Lol, I thought those were books, not alcohol.![]()
Yes, but from close, not far.You were the one who posted the photo of the Jack Daniels bottle!![]()
Technical.If done "right", you don't need an intoxicant.
And yet the girl is guilty…..There is an instruction that firmly rejects that taking a virgin equals marriage.
What happens if a boyfriend takes a virgin, and it’s done in secret? Meaning the relationship ended, and the father never knew about it. Therefore, that boyfriend didn’t even pay the bride price for a virgin.
Let’s fast forward and that same girl is engaged to a righteous man. The man has permission from her father in marriage - she accepts - and the bride price is paid. But at the wedding night - he finds out she was never a virgin (no blood) - and she’s accused of being promiscuous in her father’s house.
The man is not guilty of adultery if that’s the case. This is proof of text there was no marriage with the first boyfriend that pumped, and dumped.
Deuteronomy 22:13-21
She is guilty of circumventing the instructions of the Father, and being promiscuous in her father’s house. The instructions are clear - even if there is no marriage - the man must pay the bride price for taking a virgin - and if he can’t afford it; then he’s sold to slavery. The man that got away from paying the bride price will likely continue to fornicate. That’s why it must be reported, and dealt with.And yet the girl is guilty…..
But what would the second man be guilty of anyway? He would be like Abimelech, having done something in the integrity of his heart.
So then what was the girl guilty of? The sex she had was meaningless. It didn’t bind her to anything. In your system she should still be free to remarry. All she needs is her father’s permission and a man willing to pay a bride price.She is guilty of circumventing the instructions of the Father, and being promiscuous in her father’s house. The instructions are clear - even if there is no marriage - the man must pay the bride price for taking a virgin - and if he can’t afford it; then he’s sold to slavery. The man that got away from paying the bride price will likely continue to fornicate. That’s why it must be reported, and dealt with.
The man that actually marry’s her bears zero guilt. There is no claim of adultery on his soul. He’s innocent. Which means taking a virgin doesn’t equal marriage.
The word “law” my friend is a terrible translation. The actual word is “Instruction.” The entire book of proverbs is based on those “instructions/law.”And I don't why people here so much insist on blindly following Old Testament law?
Are you under Old Covenant, so you study law to keep Old Covenant?
Maybe we should instead understand New Covenant?
And by the way, since Old Testament Law is tasked with keeping intact existing Israel tribes, will you keep them too? You know, about keeping land inside tribe?
Do you even know what is your tribe?
The Creator says why:So then what was the girl guilty of? The sex she had was meaningless. It didn’t bind her to anything. In your system she should still be free to remarry. All she needs is her father’s permission and a man willing to pay a bride price.
You can’t say that she’s guilty of disobeying her father because you can’t assume that the father actually forbid her to have sex. And of course there’s no command forbidding sex before marriage, so a Torah keeper would have a difficult time forbidding sex before marriage anyway.
I’m really confused by this whole idea. It seems very poorly reasoned out. Why is God killing girls over sins he didn’t define or even warn us against?
Not all women experience pain or bleeding when they lose their virginity, first having sexual intercourse. Cheersand every woman is born with a hymen (so it can’t be hidden).
That’s especially true in the modern era, because women are more active in sports; and other outdoor activities. The instructions of the Father include a presumption of innocence. For example, if a wife gets raped in the country side. Only the rapist is killed for adultery, and the assumption is that the wife is the victim (it wasn’t consensual on her part).Not all women experience pain or bleeding when they lose their virginity, first having sexual intercourse. Cheers
Instruction is nonsense.The word “law” my friend is a terrible translation. The actual word is “Instruction.” The entire book of proverbs is based on those “instructions/law.”
The Father in Heaven says that there is one law/instruction for the Israelite and gentile/foreigner that joins.
Abraham - who wasn’t a Jew or Israelite - we read was blessed because he kept the Father’s instructions/law.
The Messiah quoted and taught from the Father’s instructions/law. He prayed all future believers (John 17:17) would be sanctified by the “word of the Father,” which of course includes his “instructions/law.” He is literally the law/instruction made flesh, and we are supposed to eat his flesh. Those that reject his flesh (the word) have no life.
The apostles were teaching and quoting from the instructions/law.
In Isaiah 2 - we read that all of the earth will learn from the instructions/torah in the last days.
I would think the women living in early Israel would have been very physically active as it was a largely agrarian culture. Most tasks for the women were done by hand. Consider the lives of women like Ruth, or the woman spoken of in Proverbs 31(?). In the New Testament women such as Mary, in Romans 16:6, is mentioned as one who labored much for us. Those women worked hard and probably had very little time or energy for anything else.That’s especially true in the modern era, because women are more active in sports; and other outdoor activities. The instructions of the Father include a presumption of innocence. For example, if a wife gets raped in the country side. Only the rapist is killed for adultery, and the assumption is that the wife is the victim (it wasn’t consensual on her part).
It’s written to ensure peace and joy for the land and its inhabitants. The presumption is also that they knew these instructions, and chose rebellion.Instruction is nonsense.
You don't instruct somebody by doing death sentence on them. They can't learn anything.
Do you even think why something is written? Or do you just demand it to be followed?
Law isn't instruction. Law is law. For breaking law, it's lawful to use force against breaker.It’s written to ensure peace and joy for the land and its inhabitants. The presumption is also that they knew these instructions, and chose rebellion.
Murderers are to be put to death.
Men that sleep with little boys are to be put to death.
Kidnappers are to be put to death.
Adulterers are to be put to death.
Those dishonoring mother and father are to be put to death.
Whoring daughters - that lie to their husbands about their virgin status - are to be put to death.
———————
These instructions were ignored. They were not built into modern western civilization. So what is the result my friend? Not only are men marrying whores that lie about their body count - but more often than not - those same woman end up divorcing them and taking everything they have. It’s happening everywhere.
Look at the kidnapping going on. It’s dangerous to leave your children anywhere. Even in the churches - because there is a chance the pastor or priest is a closet homosexual. This is happening because the Creator’s instructions were thrown under the bus. So there is no peace. Good luck finding a good wife. Why? There is no fear of the Creator in the land.
When my father gave instructions, it was LAW in our family.Law isn't instruction. Law is law. For breaking law, it's lawful to use force against breaker.
The word law is usually from the Hebrew word "Torah." Torah in Hebrew means instruction. Some english translations get it right by translating it to "Instruction" versus "law." For example:Law isn't instruction. Law is law. For breaking law, it's lawful to use force against breaker.


Why are there so many Christian believers that say they love "Jesus", but hate the Torah? They are "Echad." Meaning Jesus is the word made flesh. You can't hate the instructions of the Father (His Torah), and love Jesus. It's a massive contradiction.And why are you so obsessed with virginity and woman's count?
You don't instruct someone by killing him. Literally, dead can't learn.When my father gave instructions, it was LAW in our family.
I don’t think that you get to diminish the Almighty’s instructions.