Cochin Hebrew Manuscripts crushing false doctrines!

[Hailstone_Message]

My mission has been to focus on translation of the Cochin Hebrew manuscripts. Brian and Janice have been primarily involved in the translation of “The scroll of mysteries, Letter of James and the book of Matthew.” Me and my team have been focusing on key doctrinal verses that the enemy has been using to destroy the seed of the woman.

I have attached some photos below that expose 1Cor 7:36-38. Especially exposing the lie in 38 that says: “So also, whoever marries does well, but whoever does not marry will do better.”

I always knew that Paul was not encouraging anyone to be unmarried!

Additionally, the verse about Aquila and Priscilla has been exposed as false as well. Many women in churchianity try and use the vets at Acts 18:26 to try and advocate for female teachers and leadership in the congregation because Priscilla’s name was “Mentioned” before her husband, claiming that she was taking the lead in teaching Apollos. (Wa wa waaaa… ) 1Tim 2:11,12 clearly states: “Let a woman learn in silence with full submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man, but she is to remain silent.”

And the Cochin exposes the Greco Roman lie found in the Greek Manuscripts.

We are living in a time now, where the father is exposing the lies of the Greco Roman man of lawlessness who misled the entire inhabited earth off of this flawed, corrupt Greek translation of the gospels. Yes we can find great truths in the Greek, but the Bible writers were all Hebrews. The Cochin has been hidden and a conspiracy has been waging between two jealous wives, the Jews and the Gentiles.

As spoken of by the prophet Zechariah chapter 4, Paul in Romans 11 and John in Revelation (Mysteries) 11, God will graft them into one. And the two witnesses will be killed in the streets, but then God will make us one.

Anyone who is interested in translation and understanding the Cochin, feel free to reach out to me.

Shabbos Shalom.

 

[Kojent]

One of the most dangerous and frequently soul damning missteps we can make as human beings has to do with assuming that so very late in the eschatological day we finally have discovered some secret gnostic wisdom that turns all of history on its head.

The Watchtower is guilty of this, as you well know. But spiritual vagabonds, patriarchs that are a law unto themselves, are really just Mini-Watchtowers, too. Respectfully, you should know better. You just came out of a false cult. Maybe hold off on the teaching for a bit. After all, the Scriptures do say "not a novice" (1 Tim. 3:6). I'm not saying this to offend. I'm saying this because James 3:1 is serious business.

We ought to be so very circumspect whenever our flesh and our spirit just so happen to agree on an issue.

Paul absolutely promoted celibacy as a devout and acceptable lifestyle for Christians who feel called to focus on serving the Lord and have the gift of continence. Centuries of Ante-Nicene asceticism affirm this.

Our Lord Himself spoke well of those who had made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of God, and it is impossible to exegetically demonstrate that He was married or had children.

One of the more dangerous facets of the pro-polygyny community is this very Presbyterian idea that by having big families we are adding to the kingdom of God. God has no grandchildren. Many children who have the benefits of a Christian upbringing become twofold sons of Hell.

By all means, be fruitful and multiply, but understand that at the end of the day, Saul could have a kid like Jonathan and David could have a kid like Absalom.

While polygyny is no where forbidden, it is also no where positively commanded. But there are many things which are positively commanded, such as preferring one another, denying ourselves, esteeming others as greater than ourselves, going without lawful things to not lay a stumbling block before others, loving others as we love ourselves, not forsaking the assembling of saints, etc., and all of these things may situationally make polygyny a complete non-starter for a circumspect follower of Christ.

Paul asks rhetorically if one is offended, and he burns not. He elsewhere says he will gladly spend and be spent for fellow believers. He plainly states that he will not eat meat (which is lawful) if it offends his brother.

Where is this same spirit displayed here in this community?

Who has acknowledged the lawfulness of polygyny and maintained its inexpediency?

Who has had both a desire and opportunity to add to their family and laid it down for the sake of others?

Who here rather than declare and defend their rights has laid them aside as our Lord did?

All of these ideas around self-denial and marriage are bound up in the ideas of continence, singleness and chastity. They’re spiritual sinews stitched together in the context of presenting our bodies as living sacrifices, which is said to be our reasonable service.

Think on these things, friends, lest you all lead those with itching ears towards ecclesiastical autonomy and carnal excess and yet prove to be castaways. For those who make themselves teachers will face a greater condemnation and a stricter judgement.

I write these things in love. God has preserved His Word. We needn’t squint at scraps of papyri any longer.

 

[Hailstone_Message]

Now you just sound like a jealous wife.

 

[MemeFan]

While polygyny is no where forbidden, it is also no where positively commanded.

Levirate marriage if man is already married.

Taking care of widows also implies mandatory polygyny if all men are already married.

Seduction of virgin implies taking ex-virgin as additional if man is already married.

 

[MemeFan]

He elsewhere says he will gladly spend and be spent for fellow believers. He plainly states that he will not eat meat (which is lawful) if it offends his brother.

Where is this same spirit displayed here in this community?

And Paul could freely eat meat out of sight of offended. If offended doesn't know, how can he be offended?

And society can't run of avoidance of offending because literally anyone could stop whole society by claiming being offended. I'm offended you eat, so now you must starve to death.

This advice of not offending only makes sense if community is small to avoid unnecessary discord. And can't apply do this forum because too much people visit forum.

With 5000 visitors daily, to tried not to offend anyone we couldn't practically say anything. Probably some passionate monogamy-only person is visiting "those crazy people". Should we close forum just not to offend such person?

Besides, Paul is man. His advice and commands aren't mandatory, so it makes sense to ask does his ideas apply to us?

EDIT: Spelling

 

[Hailstone_Message]

Thank you for the counsel and the time you took to write it.

I wear no man’s hat, only Yeshua’s.

My assignment is mine. Yours is yours. We both answer to the same Master, not to one another. I will continue walking the path He has set before me, and I trust you will do the same.

There is no need to guard another man’s calling as though it somehow diminishes your own.

Shalom.

 

[Hailstone_Message]

Levirate marriage if man is already married.

Taking care of widows also implies mandatory polygyny if all men are already married.

Seduction of virgin implies taking ex-virgin as additional if man is already married.

He called me a newly converted man. I’m 42 yrs old and I came from the strictest sect of Christianity on the planet. I am far from a newly converted man. I fluently read and speak Hebrew and am currently in the process of translating ancient Hebrew manuscripts. What part of my walk is newly converted?

 

[Hailstone_Message]

And Paul could freely eat meat out of sight of offended. If offended doesn't know, how can he be offended.

And society can't run of avoidance of offending because literally anyone could stop whole society by claiming being offended. I'm offended you eat, so now you must starve to death.

This advice of not offending only makes sense if community is small to avoid unnecessary discord. And can't apply do this forum because too much people visit forum.

With 5000 visitors daily, be tried not to offend anyone we couldn't practically say anything. Probably some passionate monogamy-only person is visiting "those crazy people". Should we close forum just not to offend such person.

Besides, Paul is man. His advicevand commands aren't mandatory, so it makas sense to ask does his ideas apply to us?

Looks like I have my next section of the Cochin to translate. Thanks @MemeFan

 

[Kojent]

Levirate marriage if man is already married.

Taking care of widows also implies mandatory polygyny if all men are already married.

Seduction of virgin implies taking ex-virgin as additional if man is already married.

Except you aren’t a Levitical Priest. None of us are. Search BibFam and see how many threads you can find where a man is wringing his hands over whether or not to marry his dead brother’s wife who didn’t have time to produce an heir.

$5 says it’s a big fat zero.

You might be a Melchizedekian Priest by virtue of being found in Christ. Where there is a change in the priesthood, there is a change in the Law.

How ready you are to set aside the commandments of God to preserve the traditions of polygynous men!

 

[Kojent]

He called me a newly converted man. I’m 42 yrs old and I came from the strictest sect of Christianity on the planet. I am far from a newly converted man. I fluently read and speak Hebrew and am currently in the process of translating ancient Hebrew manuscripts. What part of my walk is newly converted?

Brother, you just came out of a false cult that would’ve damned your soul to Hell. Have some humility: you escaped by the grace of God, and may still be self-deceived about many things.

When it comes to the true religion, you are an absolute novice. LDS and JWs are not “sects of Christianity,” because they altogether worship a different Christ. Identity matters and it’s found in more than a mere name. If you don’t see yourself as newly converted you may still be unconverted. Again, I love you enough to tell you the truth, dude. Sorry if others here don’t. I’ve got to answer for every idle word at the end of this and I’m going to make them count for the glory of God.

“Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.” - 1 Corinthians 10:12 (KJV)

You’ve now joined a community where most men are a Mini-Watchtower unto themselves, and the light ain’t getting brighter. It’s flickering at best.

There are so many logical downstream consequences as it pertains to higher textual criticism and the doctrine of the providential preservation of Scripture, that you scarcely realize you’re walking on a razor’s edge by participating in some of this “translational” work.

“Yea, hath God really said?” is the oldest trick in the Book. We need not carry the devil’s water.

 

[Kojent]

And Paul could freely eat meat out of sight of offended. If offended doesn't know, how can he be offended.

“Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.” - 1 Corinthians 8:13 (KJV)

Keep wresting the Scriptures to your own destruction, man. I’m just going to hold up the mirror of the Word from now on.

Not only are you objectively wrong but you don’t care about being right. You keep talking about communism and society: you and everyone else here need more of Christ.

We must decrease and He must increase. We must die to ourselves and He must be found alive in us.

Lean not on your own understanding, which you seem to be practically famous for here: but in all your ways acknowledge Him and let the Holy Scriptures correct your thinking.

 

[FeministVampireQueen]

I always knew that Paul was not encouraging anyone to be unmarried!

I'm surprised you thought this was Paul's intent, and that secret manuscript translations were needed to disprove something that was never actually said to begin with.

 

[FeministVampireQueen]

Now you just sound like a jealous wife.

Next you'll be calling people "haters."

 

[Kojent]

Next you'll be calling people "haters."

I love this Brother enough to tell him the truth. I wish more people did.

 

[Kojent]

I'm surprised you thought this was Paul's intent, and that secret manuscript translations were needed to disprove something that was never actually said to begin with.

Translational work is some of the most dangerous work you can do because all translational work involves choice.

Deuteronomy 4:2 — "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you."

Proverbs 30:6 — "Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar."

Revelation 22:18-19 — "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

All of the people mixed up in this sort of higher textual criticism really need to get alone with God and/or ideally some genuinely God fearing men and really hash out what these verses mean. The verses all bark (that is, warn), but you need to know when they bite.

Don’t make a stupid mistake and end up like Nadab and Abihu, offering up strange fire to the Lord and saying to yourselves, “there’s nothing that says we can’t.”

You’re playing with fire.

“Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men.” - 2 Corinthians 5:11a (KJV)

Blotted out of the Lamb’s Book of Life? That’s the cost of being wrong on this topic. The stakes are so very high and He doesn’t suffer fools. I’d pick another hobby if it were me.

Now with that being said, I’m all for necessary translations. By all means, get a faithful translation of God’s Word in the indigenous hands of every straw skirt savage you can find. At the same time, don’t take unnecessary risks when you don’t have to.

There are more than 1,000 partial and complete English translations of God’s Word. I think we’re good here.

 

[MemeFan]

“Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.” - 1 Corinthians 8:13 (KJV)

With at least one billion Christians in world, there must be at least one militant vegan in group.

As far as I'm concerned keep eating articificial eat and taking vitamin B pills. I will keep eating chicken and beef. Offended brother can get lost.

If Paul's advice is stupid, I don't have to follow it.

Did you work 7 years for your father-in-law to buy your wife?

Keep wresting the Scriptures to your own destruction, man. I’m just going to hold up the mirror of the Word from now on.

Not only are you objectively wrong but you don’t care about being right. You keep talking about communism and society: you and everyone else here need more of Christ.

Provided zero proof. Claims to be my teacher.

In case I need to spell it to you: Paul's actions aren't Lord's commands.

We must decrease and He must increase. We must die to ourselves and He must be found alive in us.

And how to do practice that? As self-proclaimed teacher, how are you example?

Lean not on your own understanding, which you seem to be practically famous for here: but in all your ways acknowledge Him and let the Holy Scriptures correct your thinking.

Ooohhhh, so thinking so myself is forbidden. I must ask others for approved teachings. Sorry, I didn't know that.

 

[MemeFan]

Except you aren’t a Levitical Priest. None of us are. Search BibFam and see how many threads you can find where a man is wringing his hands over whether or not to marry his dead brother’s wife who didn’t have time to produce an heir.

$5 says it’s a big fat zero.

You might be a Melchizedekian Priest by virtue of being found in Christ. Where there is a change in the priesthood, there is a change in the Law.

How ready you are to set aside the commandments of God to preserve the traditions of polygynous men!

LOL.

Onan died because he refused to "properly do" Levirate marriage. And he wasn't levirate priest.

I thought you know this story from Genesis 39. And that Levirage marriage is implied in book of Ruth and that Levirage marriage has nothing with priesthood.

 

[Kojent]

With at least one billion Christians in world, there must be at least one militant vegan in group.

As far as I'm concerned keep eating articificial eat and taking vitamin B pills. I will keep eating chicken and beef. Offended brother can get lost.

If Paul's advice is stupid, I don't have to follow it.

Did you work 7 years for your father-in-law to buy your wife?


Provided zero proof. Claims to be my teacher.

In case I need to spell it to you: Paul's actions aren't Lord's commands.



And how to do practice that? As self-proclaimed teacher, how are you example?


Ooohhhh, so thinking so myself is forbidden. I must ask others for approved teachings. Sorry, I didn't know that.

For all your talk about Levirate marriage, it isn’t happening on BibFam. My point stands. In no particular order, replying to some other things you’ve written here:

1. Nothing commended to us in God’s Word may be called stupid.

2. The Lord decided who He would speak through and what He would preserve. You have no right to pick and choose.

3. You seem to be wholly incapable of being a Berean. Thinking for ourselves and being unwilling to hear reproof or allow His Word to critique our thinking by His Spirit is what’s forbidden.

4. Our Lord displayed great humility, love and self-denial. Start digging through that post history and your own heart. Be about cultivating the fruits of the spirit. If you are really following Christ, people should be able to see it.

5. Please for the sake of your own soul get some sound, biblical hermeneutics that account for the providential preservation of Holy Scripture, and the perspecuity of God’s Word. God has spoken in these last days through the person and work of His Son Jesus Christ, who had much to say to His disciples, though they could not bear it then. The Holy Spirit moved upon men like Paul to hand us down something far more than a book of uninspired suggestions.

Regarding your reckless disregard for other weaker brethren, it's anti-Christian, anti-Biblical and demonic. 1 Corinthians 8:9 says "But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak." When you write something contrary to this guidance, it's contrary to the Holy Spirit which revealed it to the Apostle and preserved it for us today.

Everything about your responses just reeks of “Get Off My Lawn” with extra steps and it’s disgusting. It’s worldly, it’s unloving, it’s unscriptural, it’s thoroughly American (so much as we have rebels for forefathers).

There’s no question that you love yourself and no one’s going to tell you what to do. But what about loving your neighbor? What about loving God to the detriment of pursuing your own selfish desires? What about living a life of consecration and self-denial?

As someone who seems to esteem the Torah, you ought to highly esteem the Books of the New Testament written to those who esteemed it also, such as the Book of Hebrews and Book of James.

I’ve tried to warn you many times about using your own worldly wisdom to instruct others.

My hands are free from your blood on the Last Day.

But I promise you that you’re going to go from being a mighty keyboard warrior to a tiny little mouse when that day comes and the Holy One whose eyes are like a flame of fire become fixed upon you.

I will testify on that day that what I wrote here, especially to you, was done in love, with the desire to build others up in the one, true and most holy faith. Without love we are nothing. Without holiness no one shall see the Lord.

By all means, mock and scoff. I'm in good company (Luke 6:26; Galatians 1:10) and serve a God whose reward is with Him (Mark 10:30). But don’t be surprised if you’re having the offals of your sacrifices rubbed in your faces.

When you make your god your belly, you reap what you sow.

Yeshua in His great mercy sent someone to this echo chamber to warn you. Ignore it at your own peril.

 

[Mojo]

Levirate marriage if man is already married.

Taking care of widows also implies mandatory polygyny if all men are already married.

Seduction of virgin implies taking ex-virgin as additional if man is already married.

I like these examples. I think they’re good evidence. If we are being 100% honest, they are implicit, not explicit commands for polygyny. I’m not sure these are a slam dunk, but they can be deduced to at least allowing the possibility of polygyny since no qualifiers come before.

 

[Kojent]

I like these examples. I think they’re good evidence. If we are being 100% honest, they are implicit, not explicit commands for polygyny. I’m not sure these are a slam dunk, but they can be deduced to at least allowing the possibility of polygyny since no qualifiers come before.

Whether men taking on additional wives or filling their bellies with meat are in view, what I’m observing in many parts of this forum is an overemphasis on legality and an under emphasis on expediency and charity.

There ain’t a lot of self-denial being promoted here and it’s a problem. We shouldn’t be proud about laying stumbling blocks before others, and yet many cage stage Christians are, whether it’s about concubines, cigars or Calvinism.

When the Apostle Paul talks about imitating him as He imitates Christ, and when the Lord pronounces a woe on those through whom offenses come, the proper, Spirit filled response isn’t to shrug our shoulders and treat these things like uninspired suggestions that we can simply take or leave. Paul expressly asks who is offended “and I burn not.”

Who here is really burning and agonizing over the possibility of offending a brother or laying before a weaker brother a stumbling block?

When we think about how God doesn’t change, the reason He gives for having Moses ask Pharoah to let His people go is striking: “that they may serve me.”

Can you imagine slaves that speak more of liberty than they do their obligations or ordinary duties? Would we not rightly suspect such slaves of mutiny?