• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Is Technocracy compatible with our faith?

Because Einstein was often right.
Keep telling yourself that!

If quantum theory guys have taken Eistein seriously, then would find non-locality phenomena 4 decades earlier.
If scientists would listen to Barry Setterfield and Dr. Peter Moore, it would erase 100 years of confusion.
 
If scientists would listen to Barry Setterfield... it would erase 100 years of confusion.

Setterfield destroyed his credibility with his nonsensical c-decay hypothesis that the speed of light is not a constant and instead that C is constantly slowing.

Which it is not.

It has been repeatedly measured by numerous people across the decades as 3×108 m/s

No decay or slowing of any kind has been measured by anyone.

It was 299,792,458 m/s in 1900 and it remains so.

If it has decayed from "millions of times faster" then that decay would be measurable even now.

Ergo, no one cares what Setterfield had to say.

Also, you can see what the speed of light is for yourself at home:

Using a microwave oven to measure the speed of light:
  • Setup: Remove the microwave's turntable to keep it stationary. Place a bar of chocolate or a layer of mini-marshmallows on a plate inside.
  • Process: Heat for a short time (e.g., 10–15 seconds) until specific spots begin to melt, then stop.
  • Measurement: Measure the distance between the centers of the melted spots. This distance represents half the wavelength. Multiply by 2 to get the full wavelength.
  • Calculation: Find the microwave's frequency on its label (typically 2,450 MHz or 2.45×109 Hz). Calculate speed using c=wavelength×frequency.
  • Result: This typically yields a result close to 294,000,000 m/s (compared to the actual ~299,792,458 m/s).
 
Setterfield destroyed his credibility with his nonsensical c-decay hypothesis that the speed of light is not a constant and instead that C is constantly slowing.

Which it is not.

It has been repeatedly measured by numerous people across the decades as 3×108 m/s

No decay or slowing of any kind has been measured by anyone.

It was 299,792,458 m/s in 1900 and it remains so.

If it has decayed from "millions of times faster" then that decay would be measurable even now.

Ergo, no one cares what Setterfield had to say.

Also, you can see what the speed of light is for yourself at home:

Using a microwave oven to measure the speed of light:
  • Setup: Remove the microwave's turntable to keep it stationary. Place a bar of chocolate or a layer of mini-marshmallows on a plate inside.
  • Process: Heat for a short time (e.g., 10–15 seconds) until specific spots begin to melt, then stop.
  • Measurement: Measure the distance between the centers of the melted spots. This distance represents half the wavelength. Multiply by 2 to get the full wavelength.
  • Calculation: Find the microwave's frequency on its label (typically 2,450 MHz or 2.45×109 Hz). Calculate speed using c=wavelength×frequency.
  • Result: This typically yields a result close to 294,000,000 m/s (compared to the actual ~299,792,458 m/s).
I love you so much. You can be such good girl. 😘
 
Using a microwave oven to measure the speed of light:
  • Setup: Remove the microwave's turntable to keep it stationary. Place a bar of chocolate or a layer of mini-marshmallows on a plate inside.
  • Process: Heat for a short time (e.g., 10–15 seconds) until specific spots begin to melt, then stop.
  • Measurement: Measure the distance between the centers of the melted spots. This distance represents half the wavelength. Multiply by 2 to get the full wavelength.
  • Calculation: Find the microwave's frequency on its label (typically 2,450 MHz or 2.45×109 Hz). Calculate speed using c=wavelength×frequency.
  • Result: This typically yields a result close to 294,000,000 m/s (compared to the actual ~299,792,458 m/s).
Did you try this?
 
I hate articles that sit behind pay walls!
I looked up what you mean by paywall. Sorry for inconvenience. I discovered the article by putting it through Google search. I will try to summarize next time. A paywall is a digital system that blocks internet users from viewing website content, news articles, or app features unless they buy a paid subscription or make a one-time purchase.
 
Back
Top