No Rings, No Drama, Just Dominion

[FollowingHim]

In this case why don’t we just do what Nick Davis of Seeking Sister Wives does and have the women get legally married

Seriously, that's one reason not to get a marriage license with wife 1. If you're not legally married, each has the ability still to "marry" someone as part of sponsoring immigration or anything else where there is benefit in that piece of paper. If you marry wife 1 you can't bring in an immigrant through marriage, while if you don't you can bring in two...

 

[steve]

I’m thinking that marrying my dog might be the safest.

 

[frederick]

I’m thinking that marrying my dog might be the safest.

You're barking up the wrong tree, @steve. Your dog will always have a bone to pick with you. Sheesh.

 

[steve]

@frederick

You have a point-er there.

 

[MemeFan]

This whole situation is great proof why concept of regulation is moronic in end. Only legal system making sense are based on natural law and case-by-case situation.

Otherwise, somebody finds "loopholes" like this and whole situation becomes totally ridiculous and moronic. And whole thing only exist because state had to give privileges.

 

[MemeFan]

The underlying intent to deceive or exploit. Can you point to ANY law that says this?

The only law I have found has to do with marrying someone from another country in order to get them into our country using the marriage as a shortcut to the process.

If the government does not define the other intents as a crime, then it is not a crime.... No?

State gave priviliges and somebody has found way to abuse them and ridicule them?

Isn't this fate of any state program? Finish doing opposite of proclamation.

 

[MemeFan]

"Sorry honey we can't get legally married but I married my male best friend."

I wonder how many wives will get cold feet why they found out potential darling is already marries with....the guy.

They both are admitting they are so unattractive they have a husband instead of wife.

 

[Mark C]

Why does ANYONE think that asking a Satanic system for its 'legal' blessing is any way to go?

The same logic ultimately says, "take the Mark, too" - it'll go easier on you.

 

[Man_in_the_Middle]

Why does ANYONE think that asking a Satanic system for its 'legal' blessing is any way to go?

The same logic ultimately says, "take the Mark, too" - it'll go easier on you.

If two straight men were to get the state to issue them a license that would benefit them financially that is not very different than getting the state to issue you a license to cut hair or to drive a commercial vehicle. You are getting the state to issue a license for your own interest and not for what it means to the state. I dare say that we only get licenses from the state because of regulation that prohibits activity otherwise.

No one is arguing about getting a marriage license from the state in order to have a valid marriage.

To equate getting any license from the state with "taking the Mark" is not realistic.

BTW, I hear that you found two ladies that were willing to "Take the Mark". LOL Congrats on that btw!

 

[Mark C]

If two straight men were to get the state to issue them a license that would benefit them financially that is not very different than getting the state to issue you a license to cut hair or to drive a commercial vehicle. You are getting the state to issue a license for your own interest and not for what it means to the state.

Correct.

In a free state, you do NOT ask permission to 'cut hair,' or farm, or fix your own plumbing, or wire an outlet.

But the connection to 'the Mark' (otherwise be prohibited from "commerce") is direct, and I contend, not only undeniable, but inevitable:

I dare say that we only get licenses from the state because of regulation that prohibits activity otherwise.

Like, "buying" or "selling." QED.

 

[Man_in_the_Middle]

But the connection to 'the Mark' (otherwise be prohibited from "commerce") is direct, and I contend, not only undeniable, but inevitable:

Like, "buying" or "selling." QED.

This is a fair point but taking "The Mark" is proceeded by those people making an image of the beast and worshiping it. No?


Rev 13:14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
Rev 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

So, the Mark that they take is voluntarily taken because they have already fully bought into the beast system. Anyone that refuses to make an image unto the beast would not see that image begin to speak and would not then worship the beast.

Yes? No?